ABC’s receпt aппoυпcemeпt regardiпg Joy Behar aпd Whoopi Goldberg’s coпtracts пot beiпg reпewed has stirred coпsiderable debate. The decisioп to part ways with two promiпeпt co-hosts of The View is reportedly tied to coпcerпs aboυt a “toxic” image sυrroυпdiпg the show, with ABC aimiпg to revamp its daytime liпeυp. Bυt was this the right move for the пetwork? Behar aпd Goldberg have loпg beeп ceпtral figυres oп The View, briпgiпg stroпg opiпioпs, hυmor, aпd seasoпed iпdυstry experieпce to the table. Their dyпamic ofteп led to heated discυssioпs, which drew viewers bυt also sparked coпtroversies.
Over receпt years, The View has faced criticism for fosteriпg aп overly combative atmosphere, with some aυdieпces feeliпg alieпated by its iпcreasiпgly polarized toпe. By lettiпg go of two of its most recogпizable hosts, ABC may be aimiпg to rebraпd the show with a fresher, more balaпced approach that appeals to a broader demographic.
Oп the other haпd, some argυe that Behar aпd Goldberg’s oυtspokeппess is exactly what gave The View its υпiqυe appeal. Kпowп for пot shyiпg away from difficυlt topics, their voices helped distiпgυish the show from other daytime talk shows. Their departυre coυld risk alieпatiпg loyal viewers who appreciated the show’s boldпess aпd williпgпess to address cυrreпt social aпd political issυes head-oп.
From a bυsiпess perspective, ABC’s decisioп likely reflects a desire to draw iп a пew geпeratioп of viewers. Iп a media laпdscape that iпcreasiпgly valυes aυtheпticity aпd respectfυl discoυrse, the пetwork might be hopiпg to reset The View’s image. Briпgiпg iп fresh faces coυld help steer the show toward a more coпstrυctive toпe, poteпtially appealiпg to aυdieпces lookiпg for less divisive discυssioпs.
Iп the eпd, oпly time will tell if this was the right move for ABC. For пow, the пetwork appears committed to reshapiпg The View to aligп with chaпgiпg viewer prefereпces. Whether this shift will attract a пew aυdieпce or deter loyal faпs remaiпs a qυestioп that will play oυt as the show’s пew format υпfolds.
Elon Musk Bans Disney’s ‘Proud’ Content on X, Says ‘Woke’ Is Not for Kids—The Internet Erupts! 🚨🔥
In yet another bold and controversial move, Elon Musk has officially banned Disney’s ‘Proud’ content from X (formerly Twitter), stating that “woke ideology is not for kids.”
This unexpected decision has sent shockwaves through social media, with supporters praising Musk for taking a stand against corporate agendas, while critics accuse him of censorship and hypocrisy.
🚨 What Exactly Happened? 🚨
The drama unfolded when Musk, known for his strong stance against ‘woke’ culture, allegedly ordered X’s moderation team to block content from Disney’s The Proud Family: Louder and Prouder—a reboot of the early 2000s animated series The Proud Family.
The show, which has been praised for its diverse representation and progressive themes, recently sparked controversy for episodes tackling issues like systemic racism, LGBTQ+ rights, and reparations.
Musk, who has previously criticized Disney for pushing ‘woke’ agendas, reportedly had enough and decided to act. In a now-deleted tweet, Musk allegedly stated:
“Disney used to make movies for kids. Now they’re making propaganda. Not on my platform.”
🔥 The Internet Explodes—War Between Musk Fans and Disney Supporters 🔥
Within minutes, social media erupted into chaos. Supporters of Musk celebrated his decision, arguing that children’s content should stay neutral and not push political messages.
🔹 Conservative voices hailed Musk as a “free speech warrior”, claiming that Disney’s content has become too politically charged.
🔹 Disney fans and progressives, on the other hand, accused Musk of hypocrisy, pointing out that he claims to support free speech yet is now censoring content he disagrees with.
One X user wrote:
“So Elon bans Disney but allows conspiracy theories and hate speech? Make it make sense.”
Another fired back:
“Finally! Someone standing up to Disney’s nonsense. Kids don’t need indoctrination.”
🚀 Musk Doubles Down—And Calls Out Disney CEO
Not one to back down from controversy, Musk fired off more tweets, including one directly aimed at Disney CEO Bob Iger.
“Disney used to inspire. Now it lectures. Parents, take note.”
He also hinted that this could be just the beginning, suggesting that X might restrict or demonetize other ‘woke’ content that he believes is harmful to children.
What’s Next? Will Disney Retaliate?
With tensions between Musk and Disney at an all-time high, many are wondering—will Disney fight back?
Will this lead to a major corporate war between X and the entertainment giant? And what does this mean for free speech on Musk’s platform?
One thing is certain—this battle is FAR from over. 🔥🔥🔥
👉 What do YOU think? Is Musk right to ban Disney’s ‘woke’ content, or is this a dangerous step toward censorship? Let us know in the comments! 🚀👀
Alec Baldwin has sparked controversy once again with his recent declaration that he would make Elon Musk leave the United States, stating, “Because he doesn’t deserve to be here.” This bold statement has ignited discussions across social media platforms and news outlets, showcasing Baldwin’s ongoing struggles with public perception and his contentious relationship with other high-profile figures.
Baldwin’s remarks came during a promotional event for his new reality show, The Baldwins, where he opened up about the challenges he has faced in the wake of the tragic shooting incident on the set of his film Rust. The actor has been vocal about his frustrations regarding various public figures, and Musk has become a particular target due to his controversial actions and statements in recent years. Baldwin’s comment reflects a broader sentiment among some public figures who feel that Musk’s behavior and business practices do not align with their values.
The backlash against Baldwin was swift. Following his comments, reports emerged that he lost an $86 million contract with Vertex Global Solutions. The company reportedly severed ties due to Baldwin’s inflammatory remarks about Musk, which they deemed inappropriate for their brand image. This incident highlights the precarious nature of celebrity endorsements and how public statements can have significant financial repercussions.
This incident is not isolated; Baldwin has faced numerous challenges in recent years, including legal battles stemming from the Rust shooting. Despite the dismissal of involuntary manslaughter charges against him, Baldwin continues to navigate the complexities of public life amid ongoing scrutiny. His comments about Musk may be seen as an attempt to reclaim his narrative and assert his opinions in a landscape where he feels increasingly marginalized.
Conclusion
Alec Baldwin’s declaration to make Elon Musk leave the U.S. has not only reignited discussions about celebrity accountability but also underscored the volatile nature of public discourse today. As Baldwin continues to deal with the aftermath of personal and professional turmoil, his comments reflect a broader frustration with influential figures who dominate headlines. The future implications of this controversy on Baldwin’s career remain to be seen, but it certainly adds another chapter to his tumultuous public life.
Iп a shockiпg aппoυпcemeпt, Oprah Wiпfrey has coпfirmed that she is leaviпg the Uпited States aпd relocatiпg to aп υпdisclosed destiпatioп, sparkiпg a flυrry of specυlatioп aboυt where the media mogυl might be headed пext.
Oprah, who has beeп a staple of Αmericaп media for decades, revealed iп a statemeпt that she has decided to step away from her loпg-time resideпce aпd bυsiпess operatioпs iп the Uпited States to explore пew opportυпities abroad. The decisioп has left faпs, followers, aпd media experts scrambliпg for aпswers as to where the billioпaire philaпthropist might go пext.
While Oprah has пot provided specific details oп her пext destiпatioп, her close associates iпdicate that she is lookiпg for a more peacefυl, private life away from the iпteпse scrυtiпy of the Αmericaп spotlight. Her statemeпt read, “Αfter mυch thoυght, I feel it’s time for me to embark oп a пew chapter iп my life, oпe that allows for more persoпal growth aпd reflectioп.”
Giveп Oprah’s high profile aпd iпflυeпce, specυlatioп aboυt her пext move has qυickly gaiпed momeпtυm. Some soυrces poiпt to Caпada as a poteпtial destiпatioп, citiпg the coυпtry’s more peacefυl atmosphere aпd its repυtatioп for offeriпg privacy. Others have sυggested that Oprah might be eyeiпg Eυrope, particυlarly Switzerlaпd or the Uпited Kiпgdom, where she has freqυeпtly visited iп the past for bυsiпess aпd persoпal retreats.
There are also rυmors that Oprah may choose to relocate to New Zealaпd or Αυstralia, regioпs kпowп for their пatυral beaυty aпd slower pace of life. Αυstralia’s thriviпg wellпess sceпe coυld be a sigпificaпt pυll for someoпe like Oprah, who has loпg beeп aп advocate for health aпd miпdfυlпess.
Oprah’s departυre from the US marks a sigпificaпt shift iп her life. The former talk-show host, media mogυl, aпd philaпthropist has ofteп beeп associated with her empoweriпg preseпce iп the Αmericaп media laпdscape. Her decisioп to leave the U.S. coυld be a respoпse to growiпg pressυres sυrroυпdiпg her pυblic persoпa, with some specυlatiпg that she is seekiпg a qυieter, more reflective life away from pυblic scrυtiпy.
This move comes oп the heels of Oprah’s receпt shifts iп her bυsiпess veпtυres, which iпclυded scaliпg back oп her traditioпal media appearaпces aпd moviпg more iпto digital aпd streamiпg coпteпt. Some believe this is part of her broader effort to focυs oп self-discovery aпd persoпal freedom.
No matter where Oprah chooses to go, there is пo deпyiпg the impact she has had oп Αmericaп cυltυre aпd global media. Her loпg-rυппiпg talk show, The Oprah Wiпfrey Show, defiпed a geпeratioп, aпd her iпflυeпce exteпds far beyoпd televisioп, as a philaпthropist, aυthor, aпd eпtrepreпeυr.
Αs specυlatioп grows aboυt her fυtυre plaпs, faпs of the media icoп are woпderiпg whether this relocatioп sigпals a shift away from her pυblic career or simply the start of a пew chapter. Whatever the case, Oprah’s пext move will υпdoυbtedly have a sigпificaпt impact oп the media world.
Stay tυпed for more υpdates as this breakiпg пews develops.
Hollywood actress and activist Alyssa Milano has made headlines after filing a $400 million lawsuit against billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk, accusing him of being responsible for the downfall of her career and financial struggles. The lawsuit, which has shocked both the entertainment and tech industries, alleges that Musk’s actions led to irreparable damage to her reputation and professional opportunities.
The Allegations Against Musk
According to legal documents filed in a California court, Milano claims that Musk’s acquisition of X (formerly Twitter) played a key role in damaging her public image. The actress, who has been an outspoken critic of Musk, argues that his decisions—including reinstating previously banned accounts and altering content moderation policies—fueled online harassment against her, making it difficult for her to secure acting roles and endorsement deals.
Milano, known for her roles in Charmed and Who’s the Boss?, has long been vocal about social justice issues, often clashing with Musk over political and societal matters. However, she now asserts that her opposition to Musk has cost her dearly, both professionally and financially.
Financial Crisis and Career Struggles
The lawsuit details the financial toll Milano has allegedly suffered, citing the loss of major acting opportunities, sponsorships, and brand partnerships. Once a household name in Hollywood, she now claims to be struggling to maintain her previous standard of living.
Milano also points to Musk’s mocking and dismissive responses to celebrities who have criticized him, arguing that his influence over social media platforms has given him the power to shape public narratives—often at the expense of his critics.
Musk’s Response
Elon Musk has yet to release an official statement regarding the lawsuit, but sources close to the Tesla and SpaceX CEO have dismissed Milano’s claims as “baseless and absurd.” Some legal experts speculate that Milano could face challenges in proving that Musk’s actions directly caused her career downturn, as Hollywood is an unpredictable industry with multiple factors influencing an actor’s success.
Public Reaction and Industry Response
Milano’s lawsuit has sparked mixed reactions. While some supporters believe she is taking a bold stand against billionaire influence in digital spaces, others argue that blaming Musk for her career decline is a stretch.
Social media users have also weighed in, with many debating whether Musk’s impact on X truly had the power to derail Milano’s career or if this is an attempt to shift blame for broader industry changes.
What’s Next?
Legal analysts predict that this case could become a high-profile battle between Hollywood and Silicon Valley, setting a precedent for how influential figures can be held accountable for their actions on social media platforms. Whether Milano’s claims hold up in court remains to be seen, but one thing is certain—this lawsuit will keep both Musk and Milano in the headlines for months to come.
In a stunning revelation, Elon Musk has sent shockwaves across the globe by reportedly posting an uncensored list and photos of celebrities allegedly linked to Sean “Diddy” Combs. The billionaire tech mogul, known for his outspoken nature and commitment to transparency, shared the bombshell information just minutes ago, declaring, “Everyone deserves to know.”
The Shocking Disclosure
According to early reports, Musk posted the list and images on X (formerly Twitter), igniting a firestorm of reactions. While details remain unclear, sources suggest that the leaked content may expose hidden connections and possible controversies involving some of the biggest names in Hollywood, music, and politics.
Social Media in Chaos
Within minutes, hashtags like #DiddyList #ElonLeaks and #HollywoodExposed began trending worldwide. Millions of users rushed to Musk’s account to verify the post, with some praising him for exposing hidden truths, while others criticized him for potential privacy violations.
Why Is Musk Doing This?
Elon Musk has frequently clashed with the entertainment industry and mainstream media, advocating for freedom of speech and uncovering hidden agendas. His latest move appears to be another step in his crusade against secrecy, though some speculate that he may have received inside information prompting this revelation.
Hollywood and Industry Reaction
The entertainment industry is reportedly in damage-control mode, with sources suggesting that some high-profile individuals are preparing legal action against Musk and X. Others have simply remained silent, likely waiting to assess the full scope of the leak before responding.
What Happens Next?
As the world watches in anticipation, many are wondering: Will Musk continue releasing more names and evidence? Will legal battles erupt? And what consequences will this revelation have on Hollywood and beyond?
One thing is certain—this is only the beginning of what could be one of the biggest celebrity controversies of the decade.
⚡ What are your thoughts? Was Musk right to expose this, or did he cross a line? Let us know in the comments!
In a shocking turn of events, beloved comedian and talk show host Ellen DeGeneres has left the United States for good. The Emmy-winning star, known for her groundbreaking daytime show The Ellen DeGeneres Show, has reportedly sold her luxurious Montecito estate in California and moved to the English countryside.
In an announcement that stunned fans worldwide, Ellen declared, “I will never return to America.” The move marks a dramatic new chapter in her life as she seeks solace away from the glare of Hollywood and the controversies that shadowed her final years on television.
Ellen’s decision to relocate has been speculated upon for months. After her daytime show ended in 2022 following allegations of workplace misconduct, the talk show icon largely retreated from the public eye.
While she denied many of the allegations, the media frenzy surrounding the scandal undeniably left a mark on her reputation.
According to sources close to Ellen, the move to England represents a desire to leave behind the negativity and focus on a quieter, more fulfilling life.
Her newly purchased home is located in a picturesque English village in the Cotswolds, renowned for its rolling hills, charming cottages, and tranquil lifestyle. The property, reportedly a sprawling 18th-century manor, features traditional stone walls, extensive gardens, and a serene countryside view.
It’s a stark contrast to the glamorous Montecito estate Ellen shared with her wife, Portia de Rossi, which epitomized Californian luxury with modern architecture, infinity pools, and ocean views. Selling the Montecito home was a bold statement in itself. Ellen and Portia had been fixtures in the tight-knit celebrity enclave, which is also home to Oprah Winfrey, Prince Harry, and Meghan Markle.
Their estate, valued at over $40 million, symbolized their status as one of Hollywood’s power couples. However, Ellen’s departure from the Montecito community appears to have been a deliberate step in her decision to distance herself from the American celebrity culture she once thrived in. Ellen’s departure isn’t just about leaving behind a home; it reflects her growing disenchantment with the United States.
In her candid statement to the press, Ellen elaborated on her reasons: “America no longer feels like home to me. The environment has become too toxic, both socially and politically.
I need a place where I can breathe, think, and rediscover who I am without the noise.” This sentiment echoes the feelings of many high-profile figures who have sought refuge abroad in recent years due to divisive political climates and media scrutiny.
While Ellen’s fans have expressed both sadness and understanding, critics were quick to question her motives. Some have accused her of running away from the controversies that tarnished her career rather than addressing them head-on. Others have pointed out that Ellen’s immense wealth affords her the privilege of escaping challenges that everyday Americans face.
Regardless of public opinion, Ellen appears resolute in her decision.
Despite her exit from the U.S., Ellen insists that she’s not stepping away from her platform entirely. In fact, she hinted at plans to produce a series of projects from her new home in England. Rumors suggest that she is exploring a return to television, albeit in a very different capacity.
A source close to Ellen revealed, “She’s thinking about doing something more low-key, perhaps a documentary series or an interview show with a more serious tone. This is not a retirement—it’s a reinvention.”
The move to England has also brought Ellen closer to her love of nature and animals. She has often spoken about her passion for wildlife conservation and her dream of living in a place where she could be surrounded by nature.
In her new English home, she plans to dedicate more time to her charity work and personal projects. Friends of the star have noted her renewed sense of peace and enthusiasm for life since making the move.
Meanwhile, Ellen’s wife, Portia, has reportedly embraced the relocation with equal enthusiasm. The couple, who celebrated their 15th wedding anniversary this year, are said to be thriving in their new surroundings.
Portia, an accomplished actress and entrepreneur, has also expressed a desire to step away from the limelight in recent years.
Together, they are embarking on this new chapter as partners, focused on their shared love for travel, art, and philanthropy. As Ellen settles into her life abroad, it remains to be seen how the public will respond to her departure in the long term.
Some fans feel a sense of loss, knowing that one of America’s most iconic entertainers has chosen to leave the country indefinitely.
Others see it as a bold and necessary move for someone seeking peace and personal growth after decades in the spotlight.
For now, Ellen DeGeneres seems to have found exactly what she was looking for: a fresh start, a new home, and the freedom to live life on her own terms. Whether she eventually returns to America or remains nestled in the English countryside, one thing is certain—Ellen is as unapologetically herself as ever, continuing to inspire conversation and captivate audiences worldwide, even from afar.
Elon Musk, the technology mogul known for his bold innovations and unfiltered opinions, has launched a public campaign to end the long-running talk show The View. The CEO of SpaceX and Tesla recently took to social media to criticize the show, calling it “divisive” and a “platform for ideological echo chambers.” The bold move sparked widespread debate and was met with both support and criticism for his actions.
Elon Musk’s disdain for The View is nothing new, but his recent efforts represent a significant escalation. According to sources close to him, Elon Musk believes the show perpetuates biased narratives and hinders constructive dialogue. The campaign began with a series of heated messages on X (formerly Twitter), where he called on his huge audience to join him in boycotting the show. “Enough is enough,” Elon Musk tweeted. “We need platforms that encourage meaningful discussions and don’t perpetuate toxic divisions. Let’s end “The View” and demand better.
The public reaction has been polarized. Supporters of Elon Musk’s campaign have praised him for addressing what they believe is a long-standing problem in the mainstream media. Many have expressed their frustration with The View, calling it an echo chamber. Hashtags like #EndTheViewNow and #FreeSpeech were trending as Elon Musk supporters expressed their approval. One user commented, “I stopped watching The View years ago because I feel like it’s an echo chamber. Elon is right to denounce it!
Critics, however, see Elon Musk’s actions as an attack on freedom of expression. Many believe that “The View” has the right to exist as a platform for different opinions, regardless of whether one agrees with the content or not. One critic wrote: “This seems to be an attempt to silence the voices he doesn’t like. Whether we agree with them or not, The View has the right to exist.
The hosts of The View have not been silent. In a recent episode, they directly addressed Elon Musk’s campaign. Whoopi Goldberg spoke up and said, “Elon Musk can say what he wants, but we’re not going anywhere.” On the contrary, it just proves that we’re doing something right. » Joy Behar added her point of view, suggesting that Elon Musk’s criticism is based on his inability to deal with different opinions. “He’s in favor of free speech until he doesn’t like the speech,” she noted.
Elon Musk also talked about larger projects that go beyond The View. He floated the idea of creating an alternative platform for open and balanced discourse. He said the new show will bring different perspectives to the forefront and promote civilized debate. “The media should unite, not divide,” Elon Musk wrote. “Let’s build something better together.” »
It is not yet clear whether Musk’s campaign will lead to the cancellation of The View. However, it has reignited the debate about the media’s role in shaping public opinion. Given Musk’s immense influence and resources, his initiative could potentially pave the way for significant changes in the media landscape. The debate continues for now, with passionate supporters and critics. What do you think of Elon Musk’s campaign to shut down The View? Is this justified or is it an excessive measure? Share your thoughts below!
Musk says emails are ‘consistent with President [Trump’s] instructions’
Posted by – Spnews February 23, 2025
Tech billionaire and Tesla CEO Elon Musk announced that all federal employees are being instructed to report their productivity in a new Trump administration initiative.
In a post Saturday on X, Musk said the report will come in the form of an email that will give federal workers a chance to report how productive they were the previous week.
If the email is ignored, Musk said, the federal government will interpret that as a resignation.
“Consistent with President @realDonaldTrump’s instructions, all federal employees will shortly receive an email requesting to understand what they got done last week,” Musk wrote. “Failure to respond will be taken as a resignation.”
WHITE HOUSE OUTLINES WHERE DOGE SAVINGS COULD GO AFTER TRUMP FLOATS RETURNING 20% TO AMERICANS
Elon Musk speaks during an event in the Oval Office with President Donald Trump at the White House Feb. 11, in Washington, D.C. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
A spokesperson from the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) confirmed Musk’s plans in a statement to Fox News Digital.
“As part of the Trump Administration’s commitment to an efficient and accountable federal workforce, OPM is asking employees to provide a brief summary of what they did last week by the end of Monday, CC’ing their manager,” the official said. “Agencies will determine any next steps.”
White House Communications Director Steven Cheung voiced support for the initiative later on Saturday, sharing a screenshot of the email in a post on X.
“This is such a good idea and even White House staffers can list all of the great things they’ve done this week, just like everyone in the Administration should do as well,” Cheung wrote.
The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE) labor union condemned Musk’s plans in a post on X, writing that it plans to “challenge any unlawful terminations of our members and federal employees across the country.”
“It is cruel and disrespectful for federal employees to be forced to justify their job duties to this out-of-touch, privileged, unelected billionaire who has never performed one single hour of honest public service in his life,” the AFGE wrote.
$1,300 COFFEE CUPS, 8,000% OVERPAY FOR SOAP DISPENSERS SHOW WASTE AS DOGE LOCKS IN ON PENTAGON
Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk (AP Photo/Susan Walsh, File)
The productivity reports came as Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) continues slashing suspected waste across the federal government. In an X post Tuesday, DOGE said it discovered 4 million active credit cards on the U.S. government’s books.
“The US government currently has ~4.6M active credit cards/accounts, which processed ~90M unique transactions for ~$40B of spend[ing] in FY24,” DOGE said in a post on X Tuesday.
President Donald Trump has been supportive of Musk’s work with DOGE. On Saturday, Trump wrote on Truth Social that though Musk is “doing a great job,” he should be “more aggressive.”
“ELON IS DOING A GREAT JOB, BUT I WOULD LIKE TO SEE HIM GET MORE AGGRESSIVE. REMEMBER, WE HAVE A COUNTRY TO SAVE, BUT ULTIMATELY, TO MAKE GREATER THAN EVER BEFORE. MAGA!,” Trump wrote.
Musk responded with an enthusiastic “Will do, Mr. President!” hours after Trump posted.
Elon Musk and President Donald Trump arrive to attend a SpaceX Starship rocket launch Nov. 19, in Brownsville, Texas. (Brandon Bell/Getty Images)
‘I can not believe that they’re doing that,’ President Donald Trump says of Maine
Posted by – Spnews February 23, 2025
Independents in a focus group supported President Donald Trump when he declared there were only two genders.
President Donald Trump on Thursday announced that he will cut off federal funding to the state of Maine if it continues to defy his executive order preventing trans athletes from competing in girls’ and women’s sports.
“I heard men are still playing in Maine,” Trump said to a gathering of Republican governors in Washington on Thursday.
“I hate to tell you this, but we’re not going to give them any federal money, they are still saying ‘we want men to play in women’s sports’ and I can not believe that they’re doing that… So we’re not going to give them any federal funding, none whatsoever, until they clean that up.”
Trump’s executive order, which was signed on Feb. 5, instructed all federal agencies to review grants, programs and policies that fail to comply with the administration’s efforts to end “male competitive participation in women’s sports… as a matter of safety, fairness, dignity, and truth.”
The order also instructed strict Title IX enforcement against any educational institutions or athletic associations that do not comply and demands federal assistance be taken away in such cases.
CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM
The Maine State House is seen at dawn in Augusta, Maine, on Jan. 3, 2024. (AP Photo/Robert F. Bukaty)
“Many sport-specific governing bodies have no official position or requirements regarding trans-identifying athletes. Others allow men to compete in women’s categories if these men reduce the testosterone in their bodies below certain levels or provide documentation of ‘sincerely held’ gender identity,” Trump’s executive order states. “These policies are unfair to female athletes and do not protect female safety.”
Shortly after the order was signed, multiple states, including Maine, California, Minnesota and others run primarily by Democrats, indicated that they would not comply with Trump.
The executive director of the primary governing body for high school sports in the state of Maine said athletic teams will continue to determine eligibility based on a student’s stated gender identity, despite the president’s executive order seeking to keep “men out of women’s sports.”
Mike Burnham, executive director of the Maine Principals’ Association (MPA), said the president’s order conflicted with state law aimed at protecting human rights and, as a result, the MPA will defer to the latter when it comes to determining athletic eligibility.
“The executive order and our Maine state Human Rights Act are in conflict, and the Maine Principal’s Association (MPA) will continue to follow state law as it pertains to gender identity,” Burnham told local news outlet Maine Public following Trump’s Feb. 5 executive order.
HOW TRANSGENDERISM IN SPORTS SHIFTED THE 2024 ELECTION AND IGNITED A NATIONAL COUNTERCULTURE
In a previous statement to Fox News Digital, Burnham reiterated that MPA would be “instructing all schools in Maine to follow the Maine Human Rights Act,” which he said was in accordance with a Jan. 21 notice from the Department of Education.
“The staff at the MPA will closely monitor any updates from federal and state authorities regarding the potential impact of the president’s executive order on high school sports participation and adjust its policy accordingly.”
Meanwhile, the U.S. Department of Education recently launched Title IX investigations into the Minnesota State High School League and the California Interscholastic Federation for refusing to comply with Trump on the issue.
“The Minnesota State High School League and the California Interscholastic Federation are free to engage in all the meaningless virtue-signaling that they want, but at the end of the day they must abide by federal law,” said Craig Trainor, acting assistant secretary for civil rights.
“(The Office of Civil Rights’) Chicago and San Francisco regional offices will conduct directed investigations into both organizations to ensure that female athletes in these states are treated with the dignity, respect and equality that the Trump administration demands. I would remind these organizations that history does not look kindly on entities and states that actively opposed the enforcement of federal civil rights laws that protect women and girls from discrimination and harassment.”
CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP
President Donald Trump signed the executive order on Feb. 5. (Donald Trump 2024 campaign)
The Education Department added that state laws do not override federal anti-discrimination laws, so the associations are subject to investigations.
However, some Democrat-run states have been quick to fall in line with Trump’s order.
The Wisconsin Interscholastic Athletic Association on Wednesday announced an update to its policies that stated only athletes “designated as females at birth” would be allowed to compete in girls’ sports, despite previously allowing trans athletes in girls’ sports dating back to 2013.